Sixth Day of Christmas: Bathsheba, the Ancestor of Jesus
December 30, 2007 by Veronica Mitchell
The last woman to receive a special mention in Matthew’s genealogy of Jesus is Bathsheba, though she is not mentioned by name. Bathsheba was the wife of Uriah the Hittite, an immigrant living in Israel in the time of King David. She conceived a child through the adulterous attentions of the king, who then arranged the death of her husband so he could marry her.
For the purposes of Matthew’s genealogy, Bathsheba’s adultery is the pertinent detail. Like Tamar and Rahab and Ruth, she had sexual impropriety in her past that every reader of Matthew’s book would remember. Matthew includes her to again draw attention to the way God has used women in his plans for Israel, even if they had scandalous histories.
But Bathsheba is different than Tamar and Rahab and Ruth, too. Matthew never mentions her by name. He calls her “the wife of Uriah.” This is, of course, to remind everyone of the sordid details of her marriage to David, but he could have just as easily said “Bathsheba, the wife of Uriah.” He doesn’t. Her name is never mentioned.
Bathsheba appears in three stories in the Bible. The first is the story of David’s adultery and murder, and the subsequent death of the child born to Bathsheba. The second story appears decades later, when David and Bathsheba’s son Solomon is in danger of being cut off from the throne by his older half-brother. The third is after Solomon’s succession to the throne, when Bathsheba makes a dangerous request on behalf of the older half-brother.
In these stories, Bathsheba’s personality never emerges. In the affair with David, she is merely an object acted upon by the king, so much so that some interpreters read their affair as a coerced act. In the two later stories, she merely repeats the words that other men put into her mouth.
Some interpreters want to read the last story as a kind of coming of age for Bathsheba. In it, Adonijah, who wants to be king, persuades Bathsheba to ask King Solomon for permission to marry the former king’s concubine. In a society where a current king inherited the old king’s harem, this is a declaration of political aspirations. When Bathsheba asks Solomon for this, Solomon resolves to kill Adonijah. Some interpreters argue that Bathsheba knew this would be the result, and was goading her son into protecting himself. If so, it would be her first and only act of self-assertion in the text.
I don’t buy that argument. Bathsheba consistently only does as she is told. The only insight into her thoughts and feelings we are given is that she mourned the death of her first husband, and that she needed comfort after the death of her first child. Other than her feelings for husband and child, Bathsheba is a blank.
Even Matthew never mentions her name.
I want to find a way to include Bathsheba in this great drama of women who acted courageously in hope and faith, and were used in God’s redemptive plans. Obviously Bathsheba was used in God’s plan: her son was the most prosperous king in Israel’s history, and she is an ancestor of Jesus. But nothing in the stories about her suggests courage or hope. She was the pawn of other men.
In terms of the text, Bathsheba never comes into her own. She never steps out of the shadow of the prominent characters around her. Scripture often uses minor characters to add complexity and depth to a story, and the motives of even minor characters is revealed in their speech, but Bathsheba remains undeveloped.
I do not want to be Bathsheba, undeveloped and unknown, her name not even mentioned where it might be most relevant. God wants something more of us than to quietly do what we are told. God wants our courage and our hope and our faith. The inventiveness of Tamar and the savvy of Rahab and the perseverance of Ruth - these are qualities subtly praised by the biblical writers in their narration. Nothing Bathsheba ever does warrants this kind of tribute.
God can use anyone. Our flaws cannot thwart God’s purposes. God used Bathsheba. But I always come away with the feeling that God used her in spite of herself, and possibly without her knowledge. Jesus’ preaching in the Gospel of Matthew uses metaphors about risk and faith and hope and courage that could easily be applied to the other women of his family tree. The pearl of great price or the servants with the ten talents fit the actions of Tamar or Rahab or Ruth. But not Bathsheba.
Bathsheba did what she was told. That is all.

This is fascinating to me. I can’t say as I’ve ever thought this deeply about many of the women mentioned in the Bible. In this light, I can’t say that I’d want to be a Bathsheba either. I absolutely believe God uses people in spite of themselves and without their knowledge and perhaps it was so with Bathsheba. But perhaps all God required of Bathsheba was to do quietly what she was told and nothing more.
Terri, I think that is trying to put a positive spin on a kind of life never esteemed in scripture. The language for what God requires of us is all active. Hungering and thirsting for righteousness is profoundly active. Bathsheba never shows any signs of this.
Mary submitted to God in the conception of Jesus and turned the world upside down as a result. Bathsheba submitted to a king and betrayed her husband and got him killed. She never shows the kind of spiritual discernment present in Mary’s submission. I think Bathsheba’s personality-less way of just doing what she was told is evidence that submission, without a longing for holiness, does nothing to form character or please God. The other, much less submissive women ancestors are praised in the narratives. Bathsheba never is.
I’ve always wondered why the name “Bathsheba” connotes wicked sexuality to me (and has for as long as I can remember). I don’t have anything like the same connotation around the name “Rahab.” Perhaps it’s the absence you’ve described - when a woman has no other notable attributes, then in our culture sexuality is what fills that vacuum.
Poor Bathsheba.
I have never thought of Bathesha this way before. I have always thought of her as a victim and felt pity. Something to ponder! Thanks so much for a new perspective.
Happy New Year.
Sometimes, I’ve wondered what more God might have done -with her participation, her effort, her belief that God was acting in her life - she seems very tossed about by the storms of change…
Thanks for responding to my comment, Veronica. I do understand what you are saying. I was merely speculating as I am wont to do. My husband is always (or frequently anyway) telling me that I should “cast down speculation”–his paraphrase of II Cor. 10:5 and his way of telling me not to read into things.